I need to go back and read this entry, but I wanted to leave a quick comment to say thank you. I have had a string of forgetting and putting Miss Snark's syndication on my friends list was one of them.
Checkmark! Gold Star! Yay, Anna!
p.s. in case you missed it, CKR 'caps in my journals.
When I read Point of Honour by Madeleine Robins, I am reading a mystery novel; others are reading a novel of alternate history about a woman P.I.
And you are all reading an absolutely kick-ass book. (With a kick-ass sequel that should not be read first, because it will spoil the first one!)
I keep trying to review it and flailing because I feel like I can't do it justice. Nevertheless: kick-ass novel that is *truly* Austen-meets-noir, with all the implications thereof there on the page.
Hahaha, yes, I know all about it! pnh edited the first one, and I edited the second. *cuddles madrobins* They really are terrific books -- I am so glad you enjoyed them!
I'm only doing it so that I can see how many different ways you can come up with to tell me I'm awesome.
Hee.
No, really -- thanks! I know I say it over and over again, but it makes me really happy to know that I am helping people understand this stuff a little better.
Hunter's Moon
anonymous
March 17 2006, 19:32:54 UTC
Let's use Hunter's Moon as an example. This is a book by Cathy Clamp and C. T. Adams. When it was sent to me by the agent, she did not say, "This is an SF novel" or "This is a shapeshifter novel" -- she said that this was a novel sent to her by another one of her clients who just happened to be Laurell K. Hamilton. Laurell had loved the book
( ... )
I'd be interested in hearing more about the debate re: critiquing outside one's genre. I have mixed feelings on the subject, and I'd love to know what other people are saying.
This is an interesting debate. Will you be posting more about it on your LJ? I'd like to hear some different perspectives on it. On the one hand I agree with your position, but at the same time, it seems to me that it can be difficult if you go too far outside the genres you're familiar with.
I went to a writer's group meeting, and found that there was a really wide variety there. I thought it was great that they were such a versatile group, but I could see members having a lot of trouble when it came to critiquing poetry, for instance. I have to wonder if the lone poet in the group was benefitting all that much.
Comments 95
Checkmark! Gold Star! Yay, Anna!
p.s. in case you missed it, CKR 'caps in my journals.
Reply
Reply
I hope your mouth is feeling better. xoxo
Reply
And you are all reading an absolutely kick-ass book. (With a kick-ass sequel that should not be read first, because it will spoil the first one!)
I keep trying to review it and flailing because I feel like I can't do it justice. Nevertheless: kick-ass novel that is *truly* Austen-meets-noir, with all the implications thereof there on the page.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Oh, that sounds so good. I'm going to have to look for them.
Reply
Reply
Hee.
No, really -- thanks! I know I say it over and over again, but it makes me really happy to know that I am helping people understand this stuff a little better.
Reply
Reply
This is a perfect example of that.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
And also you are welcome!
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
I went to a writer's group meeting, and found that there was a really wide variety there. I thought it was great that they were such a versatile group, but I could see members having a lot of trouble when it came to critiquing poetry, for instance. I have to wonder if the lone poet in the group was benefitting all that much.
Reply
Leave a comment