My google-fu is very good...
...but sacred text's is better.
Yes, who's feeling like a doofus now. I just spent a reasonable amount of time (15 minutes or so) trying to track down the characters to the Hsin Hsin Ming, which I decided is going to be my next calligraphy project. Problem is, I didn't even know what the characters in the title were (aside from the guess that one of the 'hsin's was undoubtably 心, the other was probably 信 or 思, and that the 'ming' was likely 明). I managed to slip like a ninja through no less than four separate wikipedia portals (English, Japanese, Korean, Chinese) before locating the title, which is, in fact, written: 信心銘.
Only then did it occur to me to check Sacred Texts. Which did, in fact, have it. Blarg.
In any case, to save you lovely people from the same heartbreak (in the off chance that you are also interested in the Hsin Hsin Mei), here is the text with Japanese commentary, and here is the same from Sacred Texts.
Cheers.
That will be all.
Yes, who's feeling like a doofus now. I just spent a reasonable amount of time (15 minutes or so) trying to track down the characters to the Hsin Hsin Ming, which I decided is going to be my next calligraphy project. Problem is, I didn't even know what the characters in the title were (aside from the guess that one of the 'hsin's was undoubtably 心, the other was probably 信 or 思, and that the 'ming' was likely 明). I managed to slip like a ninja through no less than four separate wikipedia portals (English, Japanese, Korean, Chinese) before locating the title, which is, in fact, written: 信心銘.
Only then did it occur to me to check Sacred Texts. Which did, in fact, have it. Blarg.
In any case, to save you lovely people from the same heartbreak (in the off chance that you are also interested in the Hsin Hsin Mei), here is the text with Japanese commentary, and here is the same from Sacred Texts.
Cheers.
That will be all.