Leave a comment

calzamante January 8 2011, 23:12:29 UTC
Clarence, you may be President of the Republic and Supreme Ruler of the Universe, but your trousers are too short.

Reply

bustedflush January 8 2011, 23:13:52 UTC
Aw, but that's what makes that last one so appealing! (Cripes, is that just me? Do I have a thing for Bald Men in Highwaters?)

Reply

calzamante January 9 2011, 14:29:34 UTC
It would perhaps be less of a stumbling block were he wearing socks. As it is, it just looks like he got dressed in the dark. :p

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

calzamante January 9 2011, 14:30:31 UTC
Oh, I am not disputing that--they could just do to be a couple of inches longer. (It's a real...thing of mine, trouser length. I get way too hung up on it.)

Reply

cheryl_bites January 9 2011, 13:08:31 UTC
The only possible explanation for this is that the trews cost £300,000 and the stylists don't want them to come into contact with a football. Cos otherwise, peg-leg kecks with no socks, or with socks that are exactly the same colour as his skin... WHAT WERE THEY THINKING.

Reply

calzamante January 9 2011, 14:33:14 UTC
This is a possibility, yes. Otherwise, as you say, what were they thinking. Those kecks are not even just a bit too short, they are WAY too short. (I don't think I've ever seen kecks written down before, somehow I always mentally heard it with an x, hmm. *still not completely Northern*)

Reply

bustedflush January 9 2011, 15:03:32 UTC
HE LOOKS FABULOUS WITH THE NO SOCKS! Anyway, it's not like he goes out like that, it's only his attire when he does shoots for misogynist magazines.

Reply

milan_love February 10 2011, 17:36:01 UTC
That's what I thought! I can't look at anything else but that.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up