Jumping on the season 3 spoiler bandwagon

Jun 13, 2007 06:43

WARNING: if you think the spoiler is the greatest thing since sliced bread, do NOT read this. Because i DON'T and this is not a happy post.

Here we go AGAIN )

spoilers 3

Leave a comment

katikat June 13 2007, 13:30:29 UTC
Why do I have this feeling that this was the condition for the show to have a 3rd season? Something like "Either you add two girls as regulars or you have no show, Eric!"

If they wanted to raise the ratings, why not return to the proven formula of season 1? Why this? I wouldn't mind these girls as recurring characters, but regulars? I bet that they'll make the boys constantly look like fumbling idiots. Condescending behavior anyone? You know this "leave it to the girls, little boys."

I hope that Eric and TPTB will hear the fans' displeasure loud and clearly! X(

Reply

katikat June 13 2007, 16:17:22 UTC
Hm, but there is another possibility too - what if the girls are meant to hunt the Winchesters down, and not be their partners? As I said here. In too much hurry to write it down again, sowwy :(

Reply

agt_spooky June 13 2007, 16:26:13 UTC
what if the girls are meant to hunt the Winchesters down, and not be their partners

That's an interesting idea and I think I could buy that if they weren't going to be regular characters. Recurring, yes. I could see the adversary thing that way, showing up every so often, like Gordon. But regular implies in basically every episode. If the girls are hunting Sam and Dean, Sam and Dean aren't doing a very good job of keeping a low profile if the girls find them episode after episode. That's why I keep thinking that they'll be traveling with the boys somehow (barf, gag) which would explain their constant presence. [sigh]

Reply

katikat June 13 2007, 18:10:31 UTC
You know, this reminds me a lot of The Sentinel. Do you remember Caroline, Cassie, Megan... How they always tried to stuff a woman between Jim and Blair? And how they failed time after time?

Maybe we should come up with tags for the show, like BMS (before Mary Sue) or BB (before bimbos) XP

Reply

agt_spooky June 14 2007, 02:49:10 UTC
You know, this reminds me a lot of The Sentinel. Do you remember Caroline, Cassie, Megan

Oh man, I immediately thought of that! And it was UPN's meddling as well that brought in those characters. Danny and Paul didn't want them.

Maybe we should come up with tags for the show, like BMS (before Mary Sue) or BB (before bimbos

LOL! Oh, I like that! Let's go with BB. :-)

Reply

agt_spooky June 14 2007, 02:37:12 UTC
Why do I have this feeling that this was the condition for the show to have a 3rd season?

Well, as we've both read tonight, that's exactly what it must've boiled down to. My hatred for Ostroff knows no bounds now. Eric's hands are tied and these girls will take over the show, 'cause that's the only kind of show Ostroff likes - ones with female leads.

bet that they'll make the boys constantly look like fumbling idiots. Condescending behavior anyone? You know this "leave it to the girls, little boys."

With Ostroff pulling the strings, that's EXACTLY what's going to happen.

God, I'm so depressed about this.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up