Haven't posted some news in a while.

[afallenautumn]

Someone looking cause problems in Ohio's very important election?
http://www.cincypost.com/2004/10/18/absen101804.html

Even MORE election troubles.
http://www.sptimes.com/2004/10/20/Pasco/College_freshman_part.shtml

I'm noticing some kind of trend here..
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04294/398767.stm

This is why southern politicians bother me
http://

Comments

[falsefashion]

no no no, you're getting this totally wrong like the person up there did. This has nothing to do with the race for president. We could take John Kerry out and put in say ... Michael Moore, or Ted Kennedy, Baraka Obama ect. My point is someone that you would support or agree with in other issues, you are less likely to speak out against when it comes to the issue with hunting for sport than say if Dick Cheney was in ohio broadcasting and bragging about "we all got one" while a dead bird is being dragged along. This has absolutely nothing to do with voting for someone. You could have said "Ok Mr. Kerry not cool" yet still say ... "yeah, I'm not a fan of that at all but that doesn't override my many dislikes of Bush". See what I'm saying???

You actually have spoken out against beliefs and in an indirect way called meat eaters "dumb", "killers" and "cruel". The PETA site you posted before was very harsh and insulting to people who eat meat. The only purpose of the site was to point out why those of us who eat meat are considered those things.

Normally I wouldn't bother asking you why you have spoken out about hunting for sports before but when John Kerry does it and boasts about it you say nothing, because well ... usually when you support someone you tend to let things slide more easily, we all do it. But once that site was posted that was extremely harsh and unfair to meat eaters, I think my question is a fair one to ask. Again, this has NOTHING to do with the Presidential race. This has to do with why speak out against one person but not another.

[afallenautumn]

I dont really agree with that. If you want an example, last year Bush was interviewed about vegetarians after John Mccain said he thinks they should vote. Bush's response was "I'm glad I had my bacon for breakfast". I didn't say a single word,on my journal or to anyone. I kept it to myself.

[falsefashion]

man, last year you were sitting across form me eating a Burger King Hamburger that I bought for you for lunch. You weren't a vegetarian/vegan last year. If you were ... you weren't here at school because the first time I met you was during the Spring Semester and you were eating meat. So why would you speak out against a statement like that if you weren't against it then? So that's not a valid argument on your part.

But how about this ... how do you explain this?
http://www.goveg.com/feat/chewonthis/chewsheet.pdf

In bold huge words at the bottom it says ...
BECAUSE YOU KNOW THIS IS WRONG

That's not attacking my views?