I'm not looking for trouble, and I am not involved in this discussion, and that is the point of what I am about to say. I'm a little confused as to why, after he called you an attention whore and gossiper, that you would post the entire convo he had with you. I mean, isn't that what he accused you of in the first place, telling people things they really didn't need to be involved in? I understand that Live Journal is supposed to be a journal, but yeah, its public. Don't get me wrong, I'm not accusing you of anything, I'm just pointing out an observation. And I am not saying this out of a defense for Dan, it would be pointless for me to defend him on LJ anyhow, but it just seems like you went and did exactly what he accused you of. And as far as Vic goes, I would talk to her, I spent 12 hours with the both of them yesterday and if you want to know what she feels about the whole thing, and even this post that you did, I would ask her.
"I'm a little confused as to why, [...] you would post the entire convo he had with you. I mean, isn't that what he accused you of in the first place, telling people things they really didn't need to be involved in?[...] Don't get me wrong, I'm not accusing you of anything, I'm just pointing out an observation
( ... )
I agree with you on a lot of what you said, but let me clear something up. I have no idea what was or was not said about Vic, what you confirmed or didn't, what the deal with "J" is, or anything in regards to that post as I was not involved in any of it. I'm not accusing you of telling anyone anything about dan or vic or "j" or anything. So in regards to you asking if I would prefer that you lied, no I wouldn't, and I don't even know what it would be that you would be lying about in the first place. As far as the hate thing, yeah I don't hate you and enjoy hanging out with you and Ed. Ed did irritate me as far as making plans with Dan and I and planning a large part of what we were going to do and then canceling without calling (until I texted him) long after he was supposed to call, and cancelling because he said he needed to get stuff done, which he apparently didn't realise when he made the plans less than two days earlier, then after he cancelled went out anyway with other people and his only reason was that they called later in
( ... )
granted, because dan wouldn't really listen to my side of the story and take that the "something confirmed" was what they already knew... and i said "something was wrong" (the detail stoppped at "something,") he WOULD have had a right to be pissed. unfortunately, he didn't care, he was already pissed off at the notion of whatever i MIGHT have done. and, i really don't think that ANYONE deserves the malice which dan shot out of his mouth, regardless. i just wish that he had a little more tact.
And I am not saying this out of a defense for Dan, it would be pointless for me to defend him on LJ anyhow, but it just seems like you went and did exactly what he accused you of. And as far as Vic goes, I would talk to her, I spent 12 hours with the both of them yesterday and if you want to know what she feels about the whole thing, and even this post that you did, I would ask her.
Reply
Reply
Reply
and, i really don't think that ANYONE deserves the malice which dan shot out of his mouth, regardless. i just wish that he had a little more tact.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment