Ah, but how are we measuring it? Engaged, energetic instruction that helps make complex concepts understandable? Or a 'fun' professor who shows lots of movies, gives plenty of extra credit, doesn't assign much homework, and curves all of the exams?
It's not all that uncommon for undergrads to equate 'good teaching' with 'class is fun and doesn't require much work.'
You've left out other things like, was the professor male or female, if female how did she dress, and what the professor's race/ethnicity was, all of which have been shown to affect one's teaching evaluations regardless of what is actually done in the classroom.
I want to be a better teacher. But, my students just want me to give them more extra credit. I don't and then they numerically evaluate me as an average to poor instructor then write on the narrative that they learned a lot. WTF. I don't trust people who can't realize that instruction might have helped them learn to decide whether or not I get to keep my job.
Reply
And I'm not sure that anyone who says it's too easy to get tenure really has room to be saying much of anything.
Reply
That was my thought exactly.
Reply
It's not all that uncommon for undergrads to equate 'good teaching' with 'class is fun and doesn't require much work.'
Reply
I want to be a better teacher. But, my students just want me to give them more extra credit. I don't and then they numerically evaluate me as an average to poor instructor then write on the narrative that they learned a lot. WTF. I don't trust people who can't realize that instruction might have helped them learn to decide whether or not I get to keep my job.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment