In queer and present danger.

Feb 19, 2009 14:13

NEWS: GOP lawmakers: Fire college professors for 'queer theory'

I found this rather ridiculous, but also a bit alarming. I doubt that the impulse is exclusive to Georgia. I'm a grad student and writing instructor at this point, so I'm using queer theory more than teaching it, so I can't really speak to any experiences with this, though I've ( Read more... )

academic "freedom", legal issues, academia-in-the-media

Leave a comment

ex_lost_kit February 19 2009, 19:29:12 UTC
I'm adverse to seeing academic structure become politicized, so my initial reaction to this movement is highly negative. This doesn't mean I support Angry Studies departments, just that if there's an argument against them, it damn well better be something better than simple homophobia.

As for whether the Angry Studies departments have been "accepted"... well, I imagine most of the support for that would come from members of those departments themselves, possibly some allies in the Sociology / Humanities departments, and then a smattering of left-leaning academics... which is to say, the majority, but it's also a politicized support and thus may not be "legitimate". I'm not inclined to try to draw up criteria whereby we could determine whether a given field is respectable or not, but I will say that I think it could be argued that there's a legitimate state interest in, if not supporting some departments at the expense of others, at least supporting students within some departments but not others.

Reply

ladyshrew February 19 2009, 19:39:10 UTC
Uh, "Angry Studies"?

Reply

biascut February 19 2009, 19:42:19 UTC
Academia shouldn't have any application to the real world! It should just study abstract stuff! And dead issues!

Reply

ladyshrew February 19 2009, 19:43:39 UTC
I study (well, studied) dead angry studies--is that an application to the real world or just a dead issue? :-D

Reply

biascut February 19 2009, 19:44:32 UTC
Heh, that was why I carefully said "dead issues" - started out to say "dead people" and then realised you can get get pretty damn political about dead people!

Reply

ladyshrew February 19 2009, 19:49:55 UTC
Tehehe. Indeed! And I wasn't picking on your wording, just having fun. ;-)

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

knut_hamson February 19 2009, 21:26:05 UTC
The dead are so easy to appropriate.

Reply

blackletter February 20 2009, 01:21:22 UTC
And you don't have to worry about them getting angry over unsavory details of their culture being revealed and analyzed by insensitive, "outsider" researchers.

Reply

ex_lost_kit February 19 2009, 19:45:27 UTC
Collective reference to Women's Studies, Black Studies, Queer Studies, and whatever other variants have dreamed up.

Reply

ex_lost_kit February 19 2009, 19:46:45 UTC
*have been dreamed up

Reply

lostreality February 19 2009, 19:47:22 UTC
ahh you are an economist I see. That explains everything :)

Reply

triphicus February 20 2009, 03:35:49 UTC
Even better, she's a libertarian.

Reply

ladyshrew February 19 2009, 19:48:55 UTC
Oh I see. So you're just saying that all women, black people, and queer people are angry. Gotcha.

Reply

ex_lost_kit February 19 2009, 19:51:07 UTC
No, I'm not.

Reply

ladyshrew February 19 2009, 19:54:06 UTC
And yet you call these "Angry Studies." Because clearly anger is the only justification for them? And, naturally, it doesn't apply to anything else that isn't "dreamed up."

Reply


Leave a comment

Up