Seeking discoveries
The following CFP (received via FICINO) is not connected to HP, but to the invention of new things (which was also something already discussed here concerning the Pòtterverse) and Renaissance magic.
[apologies for cross-posting]
CFP: Renaissance Discovery? (RSA 08)
Scholars of various Renaissance fields - including science, emblems, and
antiquarianism - have observed an instability or paradoxicality around the
operative concept of empirical discovery. Scholars have not, however,
evaluated or explained this strange observation. In some cases, discovery
seems irrelevant to the period’s production of knowledge; in others,
relevant, but discouraged or abjured. Given that discovery seems basic to
modern notions of evidence, and of interpretation, the hermeneutic and/or
epistemological consequences of the Renaissance attitude may be
considerable.
Interdisciplinary papers are invited, therefore, for a panel at RSA 2008
(Chicago) on the shape and significance of Renaissance discovery. Proposals
that attempt to draw a theoretical point out of their historical material
are especially welcome. Topics might include, but are not limited to:
-- books of secrets: why aren’t they absurd?
-- emblem interpretation: does it find anything out?
-- magical experiments: what do they produce?
-- alchemical manuals: what do they reveal?
-- forgery and authenticity: why such a persistent problem?
-- occult qualities: whatever happened to them?
-- the new world: both found and made?
-- romance anagnorosis: anticipated, or surprising?
-- from invention to discovery: a Renaissance transition?
Please send proposals of 200-350 words, along with a c.v., to J. D. Fleming
(jfleming@sfu.ca) by April 1st, 2007. Selected presenters will need to be
members of the RSA by the time of the conference (April 2008).
James Dougal Fleming
Department of English
Simon Fraser University
(604) 291-4713
cell: 778-865-0926
Laissez parler les faits.
[apologies for cross-posting]
CFP: Renaissance Discovery? (RSA 08)
Scholars of various Renaissance fields - including science, emblems, and
antiquarianism - have observed an instability or paradoxicality around the
operative concept of empirical discovery. Scholars have not, however,
evaluated or explained this strange observation. In some cases, discovery
seems irrelevant to the period’s production of knowledge; in others,
relevant, but discouraged or abjured. Given that discovery seems basic to
modern notions of evidence, and of interpretation, the hermeneutic and/or
epistemological consequences of the Renaissance attitude may be
considerable.
Interdisciplinary papers are invited, therefore, for a panel at RSA 2008
(Chicago) on the shape and significance of Renaissance discovery. Proposals
that attempt to draw a theoretical point out of their historical material
are especially welcome. Topics might include, but are not limited to:
-- books of secrets: why aren’t they absurd?
-- emblem interpretation: does it find anything out?
-- magical experiments: what do they produce?
-- alchemical manuals: what do they reveal?
-- forgery and authenticity: why such a persistent problem?
-- occult qualities: whatever happened to them?
-- the new world: both found and made?
-- romance anagnorosis: anticipated, or surprising?
-- from invention to discovery: a Renaissance transition?
Please send proposals of 200-350 words, along with a c.v., to J. D. Fleming
(jfleming@sfu.ca) by April 1st, 2007. Selected presenters will need to be
members of the RSA by the time of the conference (April 2008).
James Dougal Fleming
Department of English
Simon Fraser University
(604) 291-4713
cell: 778-865-0926
Laissez parler les faits.