I'm a young student in the early stages of graduate school and I have this idealized view that information should be freely exchanged and that science is more enjoyable and productive when this happens. But a week ago I was asked by a collaborator not to discuss our project with a friend I was meeting that day (another scientist working in the same
(
Read more... )
And certainly I've seen other labs where they never submit anything to a conference that isn't ready to be submitted to a journal, because they've had the experience of presenting something at a conference, talking to someone, and then having that person run home, whip up similar data, and publish as though it were their own idea. Me, I send anything I've got to a conference because I like the feedback, and most of what I do isn't easily re-created on the spur of the moment in another lab. It's easier to be cooperative in that environment.
So the answer is: it's complicated, like a lot of science. :) Or like anything dealing with lots of people. Or anything dealing with limited resources. There is a complex interplay of competition and cooperation.
Reply
Leave a comment