Write your story the way I want to read it, or else!

Mar 22, 2005 13:24

Or else nothing. By the time I realize that a book really isn't what I'd have wanted to read had I known its content, I most likely would've already bought it anyway. I also doubt ranting relentlessly in my own LJ would somehow bring revenge upon the author- not that I intend to harm people for writing things I wish I did not read- just saying ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

<33333333333333333 go_back_chief March 23 2005, 01:28:26 UTC
Why is it not reasonable to expect competent deatheaters, when they supposedly have been the most fearsome terrorists and aren't old nor crippled yet? Why is it not reasonable to expect moral complexity on the villain's part when all of the good guys were written as various shades of grey? Why is it not reasonable to expect characters to behave in ways consistent to how they've been written? Why is it not reasonable to expect a more two-sided, objective illustration of any issue Rowling has brought up in the books and have put a certain amount of emphasis on?

"Because Harry Potter is not The Great English Novel, and thus we shouldn't have any expectations of quality whatsoever. Because we all know that Children's Books can't have any sort of literary quality, or meaning or message or anything, because all that is reserved for The Great English Novel.";D

OK, I should stop now, because otherwise I'll just get way too bitchy. But Man that thread annoyed me, not least because I've seen so many like it in the past. I think that comment was in response to me, wasn't it? It came a bit late, so I didn't bother responding to the opinion itself, because I felt like I was done with the thread anyway. Didn't know you had written the comment in question, but that's priceless!:D I just found it funny that people would read these comments as if they're completely serious. I mean you go to a thread reading what people fear, you have to expect a certain... expressive use of language. It wouldn't occur to me to read "Save Draco from his creator, she doesn't understand him!" as with the same tone of voice as "save that dog from its owner, the owner abuses it!", but it seems these people more or less read in the exact same tone of voice in the two statements.

*shakes head*

When did having a fear of a certain development in an ongoing story suddenly become "OMG, you're trying to deprive this poor author of her free speech!!!!11111"? I just don't get it.

Write your story the way I want to read it, or else! Or else nothing.

Indeed. Why would anyone think that anyone thinks anything else? O.O

I'm just really tired of people making any reader who dares to complain about a book out to be some sulky brats who are just disgruntled the author doesn't cater to their needs/standards.

You and me, both.

Reply

Re: Oops! go_back_chief March 23 2005, 01:47:10 UTC
I just went to the thread and looked at your comment, and ah, i misunderstood that "Save Draco from his Creator, she doesn't understand him"-bit, wasn't even your comment, was it, only W's interpretation of it? (See, this is why links should always be provided when paraphrasing someone else... *grunts*)

Reply

Re: Oops! _rp_zeal_ March 23 2005, 04:42:02 UTC
See, this is why links should always be provided when paraphrasing someone else... *grunts*

I consider that(providing a link when paraphrasing)basic manner even when wanking, or else I'll seriously doubt if the wanker hasn't twisted what the OP said. *shrugs*

Reply

Re: <33333333333333333 _rp_zeal_ March 23 2005, 04:26:53 UTC
When did having a fear of a certain development in an ongoing story suddenly become "OMG, you're trying to deprive this poor author of her free speech!!!!11111"? I just don't get it.

Interestingly, none of those who fiercely defend an author's right to not be criticized for their work that I've so far come across disagree with the author's POV/takes on major issues in the books. Just saying ;)

Reply

Re: <33333333333333333 sistermagpie March 23 2005, 18:27:57 UTC
That always strikes me as well. Scratch a "just let the author define the world on her terms" and you find a "I passionately agree with the very things you are questioning in the text and possibly feel that the author agreeing with me makes me right!"

Reply

Re: <33333333333333333 ackonrad March 23 2005, 23:11:18 UTC
It's late and I don't have time for long comments, but dude, you rock so much. Your comment on that idiotic fandom rant thread was fucking brilliant - the best and truest thing I've read in ages. You show 'em, girl!

Reply

Re: <33333333333333333 go_back_chief March 24 2005, 22:53:44 UTC
Heh, thank you, though I sort of regretted getting involved. It wasn't a particularly "constructive discussion", more like an out-right flame-war. But man, that rant was so stupid and irritating, it deserved getting flamed.;D

Reply


Leave a comment

Up