you seem like a massive bitch, and you do not seem to have much to back it up with. i don't even know what to say. you and ur stuffed animals annoy me.
i am a massive bitch. i haven't always been, but i sure am now. i'm incredibly intelligent, though; but i don't know what exactly you're looking for that would "back up" my bitchiness. maybe it's not intelligence. that picture was taken in my 9-year-old sister's room, but that's not really relevent and i have stuffed animals in my room too. i do live with my parents.
seeing as i suspect that you only find my sister's stuffed animals annoying because you find me annoying, yes, there's something wrong with that. you're displacing your annoyance with me onto poor defenseless stuffed animals that never did anything to you. that's not fair.
Re: Incredibly intelligent?psilanthropistApril 3 2006, 20:50:25 UTC
intelligence and good spelling aren't the same thing. similarly, a good vocabulary is indicative of but doesn't be any means prove intelligence. and if you think that intelligence can be proved in about 600 words, the vast majority of which were written in response to questions like "john stamos vs. uncle jesse," then you yourself are clearly not a legit judge.
that was the most appropriate use of the word "autonomous" possible. "autonomous" means "free from," or "separate from." to free or separate john stamos from uncle jesse is to render him worthless. if you think that "autonomous" can only be used in relation to personal autonomy and civil liberties, please consider that words are not often borne of political and governmental ideas. i think we could say that the word "autonomous" is wholly autonomous from political context.
wrong. "what was john stamos without uncle jesse?" is applicable if they are two separate people, which they're not.
quick! let's start at the top of my application! i'll explain every single nuance of my grammatical choices to you, because i think you really warrant such an explanation! more, it's really important to me that you think highly of me, which is certainly why i as much as called you unintelligent in my last comment! you already gave me a no, i'm not sure why you're keeping this up. i have something to gain. you don't
( ... )
Re: Make up your mindpsilanthropistApril 4 2006, 20:09:27 UTC
to your specific criticism, there is no response but a pedantic one. the repetive request to warrant my use of a single semi-colon is the text-book definition of pedantic. i began by saying that grammatical knowledge is not adequate proof of intelligence (on my part or yours), but narrowed my focus to details when you pointed out specific ones. i was pedantic only about use of the word autonomous, because you wanted to argue the narrow definition and proper use of the word. as i said before, i'm just answering you. i've made no critique of your grammar or spelling whatsoever. so, if you want to nit pick, i can nit pick. i notice you essentially cede the autonomous argument, which i fought on your pedantic terms.
i do stand to gain entrance into this community, whatever that amounts to. you stand to gain nothing except feeling better about yourself. and if this is making you feel better about youself, and you have no better methods, than i feel so sorry for you that i am almost willing to keep going. but not quite.
Reply
Reply
p.s. there's nothing wrong with stuffed animals. i have them too. but the ones i saw annoyed me. is that so wrong?
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
that was the most appropriate use of the word "autonomous" possible. "autonomous" means "free from," or "separate from." to free or separate john stamos from uncle jesse is to render him worthless. if you think that "autonomous" can only be used in relation to personal autonomy and civil liberties, please consider that words are not often borne of political and governmental ideas. i think we could say that the word "autonomous" is wholly autonomous from political context.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
quick! let's start at the top of my application! i'll explain every single nuance of my grammatical choices to you, because i think you really warrant such an explanation! more, it's really important to me that you think highly of me, which is certainly why i as much as called you unintelligent in my last comment! you already gave me a no, i'm not sure why you're keeping this up. i have something to gain. you don't ( ... )
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
i do stand to gain entrance into this community, whatever that amounts to. you stand to gain nothing except feeling better about yourself. and if this is making you feel better about youself, and you have no better methods, than i feel so sorry for you that i am almost willing to keep going. but not quite.
Reply
Leave a comment