Aug 15, 2008 16:45
I prefer GNOME. I have always found it to be easier to use, more visually pleasing. It's simple and well-organized - a few essentials are laid out, the rest sequestered in intuitively labeled menus and folders. I don't like KDE - it's too Windows-y, with recursive menus and icons all over the place.
If you think about it, GNOME is kind of Mac-like. But I friggin' hate modern Macs! I think they're too flourishy and obscure what you're trying to do. I hate Windows Vista most of all because it's Windows trying to look like Macintosh and ends up with the worst of both. GNOME isn't like MacOS X or anything like that. GNOME is still clean and simple. It looks like older Macs, around system 7.5.
Could it be that simple? Could it be that I like GNOME simply because it functions like the earliest desktop I learned to use?
Linus Torvalds, I hear, prefers KDE. He says something to the effect that GNOME is too simple, so it doesn't do what he wants to do with it - with, I'm sure, some inflection of superiority in the language. Well, I suppose if you want to do a lot of things with your desktop, that's fine. But I'd rather do things from the command line, and keep my visual space relatively clear.
3.14