Leave a comment

8_23 June 12 2007, 01:14:19 UTC
Really? I thought you hated it or something, haha.

WHY ARE THERE NO PICTURES OF THIS? Do you know how much I love this news? A lot. I love it a lot.

Well, he might not need the points, since 225 is nothing to him. He could not play so many tournaments and Nadal would have to win every single tournament he entered for the difference to be made up. Which, granted, could conceivably happen in a different universe, but it's not the points I'm worried about.

I think you're right - Lleyton will definitely be a contender for it this year. I don't want to say something ridiculous like whoever wins between him and Roddick (barring any shockers, naturally) will win the title, but they're the main contenders. Weather conditions will help or hinder Nadal, Fish is coming off that bizarre injury, and unless I'm overlooking someone, there aren't really any very strong grass players in the draw. Of course, there are always the surprises and the new guys, but this is just a really long-winded way of saying that I agree with you, and Lleyton will likely win it again.

Reply

flvy June 12 2007, 01:51:43 UTC
Haha no it's cute.

I believe it was in Andy's blog. I know you'd LOVE IT which is why I told you :0). Just not as open as the Federer love. Now I have a mental image of the three of them at dinner.

Totally.

Roddick or Hewitt to win Queens. And they both better hope they aren't on Roger's side of the draw.

Reply

8_23 June 12 2007, 02:01:49 UTC
And they both better hope they aren't on Roger's side of the draw.

I will be NOT HAPPY if they are.

Oh, and hey, do you have any links about how Wimbledon seeding works? I know it's supposed to reward players who did well on grass last year, but exactly how does that work? Or is the whole system very secretive?

Reply

flvy June 12 2007, 02:06:00 UTC
I have noooooo idea how it works. I know they get points for the last few years though.

Like Andy should be seeded third.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up