Delicious alternatives

Dec 16, 2010 22:26

Hi all,

We've seen the news that Yahoo is pulling the plug on Delicious, and we're currently investigating alternatives. The two mentioned most frequently are Pinboard and Diigo. If anyone has experience with Delicious alternatives, let us know!

mod posts, tagging

Leave a comment

zeborahnz December 17 2010, 08:04:49 UTC
I've used Diigo a lot. It doesn't have a direct analogue to tag bundles, but otherwise I really like it.

Reply

sanguinity December 17 2010, 16:48:46 UTC
We've currently got ~1500 tags, and we haven't done any serious work yet organizing by genre, nationality, or ethnicity. Does Diigo have something that would save users from manually scrolling through a list of several thousand tags?

Reply

holyschist December 17 2010, 19:15:37 UTC
I have only just started using Diigo, so someone else may know of something better, but the only thing I can see is "lists"--which requires manually adding each bookmark to each list individually. There does not seem to be a way to add a bookmark to multiple lists simultaneously.

I am really surprised that none of the major alternatives I've seen so far have anything like tag bundling. :/

Reply

sanguinity December 17 2010, 19:19:24 UTC
Manually adding each bookmark, not each tag? ...gah.

Yeah, I've been surprised by that, too. I haven't yet waded through the big list of social bookmarking sites (and won't be able to until after Christmas), but I've got to believe there's something in there that lets you handle thousands of tags?

Reply

holyschist December 17 2010, 19:31:48 UTC
It appears so, unless I'm missing something.

Google Bookmarks has a much more efficient way to add things to lists, but it's still...not ideal.

So far most of the other sites I see recommended are very focused on visual thumbnails and caching...not the most useful features for indexing book reviews (I'm sort of baffled as to what visual thumbnails ARE good for--I can't tell from a thumbnail of a costuming website whether it covers 16th century Italian or 14th century Japanese, personally. That's what text notes and tags are for!).

I'm frankly surprised Yahoo isn't trying to raise capital to save or sell Delicious, as Xmarks did--especially given the foothold Delicious got in the education world. There are a lot of unhappy libraries out there.

Reply

sanguinity December 17 2010, 19:37:07 UTC
I'm surprised by that, too. I've seen an appeal to yahoo to open source it, but at the moment, I have to work with the assumption that it will cease to exist sometime in the indeterminate future.

...and it might be that a bookmarking site isn't the best choice for indexing book reviews. But going away from finding a new bookmarking site means throwing away a decent chunk of the work that's been done. And I really don't want to do that.

Reply

holyschist December 17 2010, 20:24:02 UTC
Yeah, we are having the same problem with queerlit50, but not on anywhere NEAR your scale. But I'm not sure what would work better for indexing book reviews than a bookmarking site, either....

Reply

sanguinity December 17 2010, 20:34:46 UTC
A site about books, like LibraryThing. Most tags are associated with books, anyway, and you could have "reviews" be links to the books on the comm. What you'd lose is having an efficient way to cross-index by community member.

Reply

holyschist December 17 2010, 20:55:42 UTC
Hmmm. That seems bit more difficult for browsing by topic, too, and there would also be lots of non-50books_poc reviews. I don't think there'd be a way to filter?

I dunno, but I'm not thrilled with any of the review sites out there, either.

Reply

sanguinity December 17 2010, 21:42:53 UTC
Hrm, you're right, you can't have multiple reviews for your own listing of a book. (You can have multiple links in you own review, but by then you really are pushing the format.)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up