I technically just started watching this year and I know how Zack is! They play the earlier episodes so much that it wouldn't be hard for people to find out who Zack is.
Yeah, I started watching regularly a bit over a year ago and it wasn't that hard to get all caught up. I think by the end of the season (at the very least by a month or so after the season ended) I'd seen every episode. They clearly do not understand the power of modern technology.
This! Have they never heard of Netflix??? lol. Or ya know the constant replaying of the series on TNT...Santa in the Slush and Knight on the Grid are on this evening I believe...both with Zach in them.
I kind of don't understand these "new viewers" of a show who jump into a show 5 or 6 seasons in and just start watching from there and never go back and watch the earlier seasons. Like what? How does anything even make sense? I only started watching Bones a couple of years ago, but I didn't just start watching from season 4. I started with season 1 by renting the DVDs. Am I just weird? Is it really common for people to start watching a show after 5 or 6 seasons and never watch the earlier seasons?
I generally watched in order, I started last April, but I was so curious to see if B/B were together that I watched the newest episode (which happened to be the 100th) and then I went back to watching in order.
That makes total sense to me, switching back and forth between old and new eps. But what Stephen Nathan says in the interview above seems to indicate that he believes there are a significant number of new viewers who have tuned in at some point after Season 3 and have never watched any of the old eps. I guess I'm trying to determine if that could actually be true.
I started when I caught a the last two episodes of season 3 on TNT and got hooked so I went back and watched it from the Pilot straight through. It would drive me crazy to not know all the backstories.
Comments 30
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment