So Pissed @ Bush

[10secimportpyro]

So I was pissed at Bush about everything before but then the whole hurricane Katrina comes along. I mean he sucks balls (Bush) at dealing with the situation and what not. Fine. I can deal with that more so but then today he nominates John Roberts to be Chief Justice. What the FUCK

Comments

[communistben]

We are killing babies. When I punch a pregnant woman in the stomach and kill the "thing" as you would like to put it, I would be charged for homicide, if I kill a pregnant lady, I would be charged for double homicide. Whats the difference with a doctor doing it or using a clothe hanger? That is the point with Roe V Wade, thats why its such a hot topic, its about many things, what makes a fetus/baby a living breathing human being, why is it legal to kill babies in the wombs of mothers? Liberals tend to favor baby killing while opposing the death penalty(Dukakis being the clear example of classic modern American liberalism). "she made the mistake in the first place by getting knocked up" game is part of the issue with this decision, how is that a different story? Many people oppose Roe V Wade because of that, it punishes the wrong person, it instead destroys an innocent life. Even "Jane Roe" has opposed abortion, the very person who put the issue to the supreme court!!! Jane Roe was a pawn of ultra-leftist abortion advocates, thats how evil the Roe side of the issue is, using a vulnerable pregnant young woman to win the case.

[10secimportpyro]

Well, if we are killing babies, then why are abortions still legal? I think it is less about killing babies and more having to do with a "woman's right to choose." You make good points about double standards about abortion and killing a pregnant woman and such. I guess the courts believe that a woman can choose to terminate her own fetus/living self. But then that's another issue about right to die (I know, I know, you are thinking about Terry Schaivo!!). I am for the death penalty, nothing against killing a crazed murderer in the purest sense. I am not arguing against it. You're right about many people opposing Roe v. Wade...many people also support it. If a woman get's an abortion during a certain amount of time, is their "life" in her womb? Besides, do fetus' have rights? Women do, but do their unborn (especially debatable unborn)? Jane Roe was for abortion for a long time. True, she is now opposed to abortions, but she was for them awhile ago. I don't see what's so bad about the "ultra-leftist" abortion advocates from the 1970's. I mean it got us Roe V Wade...but of course, I'm not saying ultra-leftism is a good thing. We need things in moderation in general.